Bubble-Column-CFD-Simulation-RNG_isosurface-FetchCFD.jpg size: 0.043123 MB
Bubble-Column-CFD-Simulation-SAS_isosurface-FetchCFD.jpg size: 0.065235 MB
Bubble-Column-CFD-Simulation-LES-vs-SAS-vs-RNG-Turbulence-Model-Comparison.jpg size: 0.158373 MB
Embed Code for LES vs SAS vs RNG Turbulence Model Comparison in Bubble Column CFD Study
Copy the embed code below to include this project on your website:
Les vs sas vs rng turbulence model comparison in bubble column cfd study
NoAI: This project, including models, simulations, images, and descriptions, may not be used within datasets, during the developmental process, or as inputs for generative AI tools.
About the LES vs SAS vs RNG Turbulence Model Comparison in Bubble Column CFD Study Project
In this bubble column simulation study turbulence models namely LES, SAS (Scale-Adaptive Simulation) and RNG (Re-Normalisation Group) are compared. Total time of simulation is 200 s with time step size of 0.005 s. CFD results are comprised of the Euler–Euler method of ANSYS CFX. Here bubbles are not individually considered, rather the dispersed phase is ensemble averaged. Scale adaptive simulation was able to capture detailed bubbly flow (bubble plume) similar to LES. Based on scale adaptive simulation of bubble column flows by Masood et al.
Related Projects
Sign up to join the conversation about LES vs SAS vs RNG Turbulence Model Comparison in Bubble Column CFD Study
Post a comment! Share insights on LES vs SAS vs RNG Turbulence Model Comparison in Bubble Column CFD Study, ask questions, and connect with other users. Whether you're curious about the 3D model, fluid simulation, or finite element analysis, your comments enrich the conversation.
No responses added yet.